Dallong-Galicinao v. Castro A.C. No. 6396, 25 October 2005

Facts: Atty. Castro, a private practitioner, went to the office of Atty. Dallong-Galicinao, the clerk of court of Bambang (Nueva Vizcaya) RTC, to inquire whether the complete records of a civil case had already been remanded to the court of origin. Atty. Castro was not the counsel of record of either party in the said civil case. When denied such request, Atty. Castro hurled invectives at Atty. Dallong-Galicinao which caused the same to file a complaint-affidavit against the former for unprofessional conduct. Due to Atty. Castro’s public apology, Atty. Dallong-Galicinao expressed her desire not to appear on the next hearing.

Issue: Whether or not Atty. Castro should be held administratively liable.

Decision: Yes. Not being the counsel of record and there being no authorization from either the parties to represent them, Atty. Castro has no right to impose his will on the clerk of court. Although the penalty should be tempered since Atty. Castro apologized and Atty. Dallong-Galicinao accepted it. This is not to say that Atty. Castro should be absolved of his actuations. Atty. Castro is ordered fined in the amount of P10,000.00 with a warning that any similar infractions shall be dealt with more severely.

Credit to:
Case Digest Author
Lenard L. Bautista
Arellano University School of Law


One thought on “Dallong-Galicinao v. Castro A.C. No. 6396, 25 October 2005

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: