PRIVACY OF COMMUNICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE

R.A. No. 4200 (Anti-Wire Tapping Law) (1965)
- Arts, 290, 291, 292 and 299. Revised Penal Code.
- Gaanan vs. IAC, 145 SCRA 113 (1986)
- Katz vs. U.S., 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
- Ramirez vs. Ca, G.R. No. 93833, September 28, 1995
- Salcedo-Ortanez v. CA, 235 SCRA 111 (1994)
- Alejano v. Cabuay, G.R. No. 160792, August 25, 2005
Privileged Communications
- In Re Laureta, 148 SCRA 382 (1987)
- People vs. Albofera, 152 SCRA 123 (1987)
- Zulueta v. Court of Appeals, 253 SCRA 699 (1996)
- Deano v. Godinez, 12 SCRA 483 (1964)
- Waterhouse Drug Corporation v. NLRC, G.R. No. 113271. October 16, 1997
Exclusionary Rule
- Art. III, Sec. 3(2)
- Silverthorne Lumber vs. US, 251 US 385 (1920)
- People v. Aruta, G.R. 120915, April 3, 1998
- People v. Rondero, G.R. 125687, December 9, 1999
Liability for damages
- Aberca vs. Ver, 160 SCRA 590 (1989)

One thought on “PRIVACY OF COMMUNICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE”

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

One thought on “PRIVACY OF COMMUNICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE”